This research aims to assess and understand the forensic knowledge of police officers by collecting information about the effect of training, the amount of interaction with CSIs (crime scene investigators, length of service (i.e., experience), and any additional training received, and how these aspects affect the effectiveness of officers at crime scenes, and in forensic decision making. It also looks to potentially identify any gaps in the forensic training of police officers such as knowledge of procedures for handling evidence at crime scenes. A survey based approach was used to collect data from 41 participants, the responses revealed a variety of training experiences, the most prevalent being initial training at the start of their employment with the police but also including formal courses and continual on-the-job training. A significant proportion of those who received initial training perceived it as insufficient, suggesting there are potential gaps in the training they received. Additionally, participants reported a need for increased communication with CSIs, underlining the importance of effective communication on officers’ confidence and knowledge. The variability of knowledge scores and confidence levels received from the participants with varying lengths of service also emphasises the need for ongoing forensic ability development. Despite limitations such as small sample size and potential response bias, this research provides valuable insights into the need for further forensic training for police officers. To identify specific areas for development, further research could look into particular components of police officer training programmes to ensure officers have the skills and knowledge necessary to effectively manage crime scenes and handle forensic evidence.
PLEASE NOTE: You must be a member of the University of Lincoln to be able to view this dissertation. Please log in here.